Global warming has been an important concern worldwide scenario. Greenhouse gases like CO2 mainly contribute to the step-up in average global temperature. The scientists, attempts have been made to reduce the CO2 content in the atmosphere [1]. The conversion of CO2 to valuable chemicals such as CO, CH4, and CH3OH, has drawn great attention for use in supporting carbon capture and utilization (CCU). CO2 was converted into methane at low temperatures with an electric field (EF), which was reported in Chem. Lett. on January (2020) by Prof. Y Sekine and his team from Applied Chemistry, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. Results show that 5 wt%Ru/CeO2 catalyst exhibited high and stable catalytic activity for CO2 methanation with the electric field [2]. Methane (CH4) can be used not only as fuel but also as a hydrogen carrier via transportation in existing infrastructure for town gas. Especially in Germany, some plants have already been launched based on the concept of “Power to Gas” [3].
Figure 1. CO2 methanation using Ru supported CeO2 in an EF. Image credited to K. Yamada et al., from Waseda University, Japan.
The recent development in CO2 methanation
The dissociation of CO2 has a high activation barrier because of the high thermodynamic stability of CO2. Recently, to decrease the reaction temperature, unconventional reaction systems such as electrocatalysis and photocatalysis have been applied intensively to CO2 methanation.
K. Yamada et al., developed a new material such as Ru catalyst supported on CeO2 have showed good activity for CO2 methanation at low temperatures in an EF. Catalyst preparation was done by the impregnation method using (Ru(acac)3) precursor and CeO2 powder. They have also studied the role of EF in the reaction by comparison with some of the conventional (not imposing an EF) catalytic reaction.
Method of CO2 methanation and activity tests
They have performed CO2 methanation reactions and the activity tests for the evaluation of partial pressure effects for CO2 and H2, the reactant feed gases in various H2/CO2 ratios were arranged to the total flow rate of 200 SCCM by diluted Ar. Gaseous products including CO, CH4, and CO2 were analyzed using GC-FID (GC-14B; Shimadzu Corp.) equipped with a Porapak N packed column and a methanizer (Ru/Al2O3 catalyst). A cold trap was placed at the exit of the reactor to condense water formation. In this case they have calculated CO2 conversion, CH4 selectivity, and CO2 consumption rate using the respective formula, which was mentioned in their research paper.
They have also used various supported metals for the CO2 reduction reaction at the same reaction conditions. Results show that CO was formed over all the tested metal catalysts, whereas CH4 was formed over Ru, Ni or Co supported catalysts. Especially, 5 wt% Ru/CeO2 catalysts showed the highest CO2 conversion and CH4 selectivity (17.4% and 96.4%, respectively) among the tested metal catalysts. Lower Ru supported catalyst of 0.5 wt% Ru/CeO2 show much low CH4 selectivity than all other tested catalysts. Therefore, the previous catalyst (denoted as Ru/CeO2) is a suitable catalyst for CO2 methanation in EF.
On conclusions, Ru/CeO2 catalyst exhibits high and stable activity for CO2 methanation without the hindrance of CO adsorbed onto the Ru particle surface in EF at low temperature.
References
- I. Sheedhar et al., Catal. Sci. Technol., 9, 4478 (2019).
- K. Yamada et al., Chem. Lett. 49, 303 (2020).
- M. Götz et al., Renew. Energy 85, 1371 (2016).
Blog Written By
Dr. A. S. Ganeshraja
Assistant Professor
National College, Tiruchirappalli
Tamil Nadu, India
Editors
Dr. S. Chandrasekar
Dr. K. Rajkumar
Reviewers
Dr. Y. Sasikumar
Dr. S. Thirumurugan
Comments
Post a Comment